Blog

We have a dedicated bus track (Obahn) that runs from the city of Adelaide to the Northern suburbs. The bus runs at speed along the track and didn’t have time to stop completely when the tree branch (red gum tree I think) split off in front of us. Both directions are now closed and lots of people, including me, are now going to be home late.

This is a stray that we feed being dramatic under my son's car. To add to the drama is the fact that his car is damaged from a friend's sister backing into him in their driveway. Lazlo (what we call the cat) knows how to milk the situation for maximum sympathy.

All these replies came at the same time 1 day after I posted the post. All the replies look almost identical.

This is a physics paper involving the spectral lines of hydrogen. If you are unfamiliar with that topic and the math behind it, you may find this paper difficult to understand.

In my previous papers in this sub, I demonstrated an alternative but equally compatible framework for physics, however it lacked the ability to accurately predict unexplained ratios like the fine structure constant.

Those papers give further context to understand this paper. You can find the first paper in the series that involves gravity and standard kinematics here, and the subreddit here
You can find the second paper in the series, including discussion with other redditors on its successes and faillures here

That second paper showed that even if my system was compatible, it failed to explain the fine structure constant or other constants in any meaningful way.

In my new paper

I have now found the source of that mismatch between my compatible geometrically based system, and the one we are using now. It is due to the spectral lines of hydrogen being measured in units which are not fundamental to the Universe itself.
Angstrom? If you measure it in that you get a multiple that is not fundamentally tied to the equation set itself.

However, what I noticed is, if you take the inverse of the series, it doesn't change the relationships, which was the most important part.

What does change, is that the series converges to 1, and that same 1 is the fundamental unit of measurement from my previous system.

For those people who find this too difficult to understand, I do plan to make another version soon that is more user friendly, and don't take it to heart because it took my years and years and thousands of hours of thinking to be able to understand this myself.

But basically this all points to the fact that yes, QCD and QED are still right, but now all the constants and sources for the constants should be able to be known.

Feynman diagrams are still useful and true, but they become basically a formal statistics route to the same problems.

I do plan to do follow up papers where i should be able to nail all the constants now as coming directly from my system because I have a measurement bridge to use. But it's late at night and I just wanna get this out there and go to sleep.

I am pretty sure once the world picks up what I'm putting down, ya'll are gonna run away with this faster than I can even keep up. I'm not even that smart I just solved this through persistence and trial and error. I always believed I could do it, and I never gave up. I tried lots of things that failed before this though, over the years.

I’ve recently discovered what the middle part is for due to searching for my answer but no luck. Not a mistake when making the scissors either as the rest of them were like this too. I can only trust in Reddit to help me now and I do thoroughly apologise if I anger anyone with my curiosity.

[OC] @Cloudview.Photography