1783380403Defiant_Efficiency_20

Edit { 2700 views and nobody could find a flaw with the math? I think thats a good sign}

I have created a geometric explanation for the source of the fine structure constant and I want to make sure the math is correct.

I started with redefining the meter using the pendulum equation. This gives a length for the meter that is calibrated with time, through gravity.

This allowed me to express little g as a pure geometric object.
Once I did that, I was able to use it to define other areas of physics the same way.
In doing so, I found geometric relationships for many classical physics equations.

Additionally, I was able to show that the fine structure constant is simply just the natural balance point between two circles in 4dimensions, translated into our 3d world through e^x = pi

I do believe this is actually a potential grand unified theory, because it suggests all forces and fields are just relationships between N dimensional circular or spherical objects.

So if anyone has the time to give this serious thought and consideration and double check my math before I sing this song at the top of a mountain… I would be grateful!

Here is the paper: https://zenodo.org/records/21225706